Skip to content

April 18th, 2005 Trial Analysis: Janet Arvizo (Cross-Examination), Part 1 of 4

June 15, 2013

Mesereau’s cross examination continued today and he started by questioning Janet about her legal squabbles with her ex-husband David. She was represented pro bono by attorney Michael Manning from 2001-2003, and of course Janet’s unnecessary testimony of being represented pro bono was stricken from the record! Mesereau questioned her about Manning’s representation of her during that time period because he wanted to show the jury how Janet had yet another opportunity to notify someone of her alleged “imprisonment”, yet didn’t do so. Janet asserted attorney-client privilege, and didn’t answer the question.

17 CROSS-EXAMINATION (Continued)

 

18 BY MR. MESEREAU:

 

19 Q. Ms. Arvizo, throughout January, February,

 

20 March and April of 2003, you were being represented

 

21 by counsel in proceedings related to your ex-husband

 

22 David, correct?

 

23 A. Of what year?

 

24 Q. 2003.

 

25 A. Yes.

 

26 Q. And without going into much of the detail,

 

27 you were represented by a lawyer who you’ve

 

28 mentioned already named Michael Manning, correct? 6546

 

1 A. For what?

 

2 Q. For your request for spousal support, your

 

3 issues involving David Arvizo and your domestic

 

4 proceeding, correct?

 

5 A. This is correct.

 

6 Q. And documents related to your requests for

 

7 spousal support from David and other issues related

 

8 to your divorce were being periodically filed by

 

9 Attorney Michael Manning, correct?

 

10 A. I don’t understand his question very well,

 

11 but something about spousal support and child

 

12 support, that was in effect for already almost —

 

13 almost, my best estimate, for almost three years.

 

14 We had been waiting for that court date for years

 

15 already. That’s my best estimate.

 

16 Q. And how long do you recall Michael Manning

 

17 representing you?

 

18 A. I think, my best estimate, since 2001. I

 

19 was way at the bottom of his list because I — he

 

20 was providing his services for free.

 

21 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

22 THE COURT: Stricken after the date.

 

23 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: So would it be accurate to

 

24 say, based on what you remember, Attorney Michael

 

25 Manning was representing you in 2001, 2002, 2003,

 

26 and 2004 on issues related to your ex-husband?

 

27 A. Yes.

 

28 Q. And various income and expense declarations, 6547

 

1 various declarations, various documents were

 

2 periodically being filed with the court by Attorney

 

3 Manning on your behalf, right?

 

4 A. If I clearly — if I understand his

 

5 question, I think with Mr. Manning, that was handled

 

6 in a bulk, and I think it was probably in the first

 

7 meeting that I had ever met with him, and I held

 

8 onto those things. That’s the best I can remember.

 

9 So he did it when he had time because, like I said,

 

10 I was at the bottom of his list.

 

11 Q. Would it be accurate to say that this lawyer

 

12 filed documents on your behalf on October 15th,

 

13 2001, October 16th, 2001, November 6th, 2001,

 

14 January 10th, 2002, April of 2002, June 25th, 2002,

 

15 January 6th, 2003, January 23rd, 2003, March 5th,

 

16 2003, and that there was a hearing on March 11th,

 

17 2003, involving your issues with David? Does that

 

18 sound accurate to you?

 

19 A. I don’t know what he’s trying to say. But

 

20 like I said, in the initial meeting with him, to the

 

21 best of my recollection, it was handled like in a

 

22 package, he had like a package already made. So

 

23 when he had time, he went ahead and took care of it

 

24 himself. Because he made me aware, since he was

 

25 doing it for free, it was as he could, so I had to

 

26 be patient.

 

27 Q. Would it refresh your recollection if I just

 

28 showed you all those filed documents that were filed 6548

 

1 with the court?

 

2 A. Yes. He filed them accordingly to when he

 

3 had time, because I was not a paying customer.

 

4 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

5 THE COURT: After “Yes,” I’ll strike.

 

6 MR. MESEREAU: May I approach, Your Honor?

 

7 THE COURT: Yes.

 

8 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Miss Arvizo, have you had

 

9 a chance to look at those court documents?

 

10 A. Just the date on them, the same ones he just

 

11 said.

 

12 Q. Do they refresh your recollection that your

 

13 attorney was filing documents throughout those years

 

14 on your behalf?

 

15 A. Like I said, he went — according to when he

 

16 had time, yes, that’s correct.

 

17 Q. All of those years, this attorney was

 

18 representing you in your domestic problems with your

 

19 ex-husband David, right?

 

20 A. Yes.

 

21 Q. Okay. I think it goes without saying that

 

22 this lawyer was representing you during the time

 

23 period you claim you were being harassed and falsely

 

24 imprisoned by Mr. Jackson’s associates, correct?

 

25 A. Yes.

 

26 Q. And I think you’ve already said, you never

 

27 told this lawyer at any time that anyone in your

 

28 family was being held against their will, correct? 6549

 

1 A. Are you — is that attorney-client

 

2 privilege? Because he’s still my attorney.

 

3 Q. If you’re asserting the privilege, I will

 

4 not ask any further into that.

 

5 A. Yes, please.

 

6 Q. Okay. Is Attorney Michael Manning still

 

7 representing you?

 

8 A. No, he’s not.

 

9 Q. Okay. Now, you indicated to the jury that

 

10 this attorney was representing you for free; is that

 

11 correct?

 

12 A. Yes, this is correct.

 

13 Q. Didn’t your attorney at one point file

 

14 documents with the court asking that your ex-husband

 

15 pay your fees?

 

16 A. Yes, this is correct.

Next, Mesereau questioned Janet about a complaint she filed with police against her ex-husband October 4th, 2001. She brought photos of herself and her children with celebrities in order to prove to the detective that she really had contact with them. Just listen to her ridiculous answer when asked if she had ever gone to the Hollenbeck police station!

17 Q. Now, in the — just to set the record

 

18 straight on dates, it appears that your divorce

 

19 action was filed October 15th, 2001. Does that make

 

20 sense to you?

 

21 A. The best I can remember is after David was

 

22 arrested and the first day he presented himself at

 

23 the criminal courts is when Michael Manning handed

 

24 him already the documents for divorce.

 

25 Q. Okay.

 

26 A. That’s the best I can remember how it

 

27 happened.

 

28 Q. And do you recall approximately when he was 6550

 

1 first arrested?

 

2 A. I think he was arrested either the end of

 

3 September — I think my best estimate is the end of

 

4 September, but it could have possibly been the

 

5 beginning of October. But the best I can remember

 

6 is the end of September.

 

7 Q. Now, on October 4th, 2001, you went to the

 

8 Hollenbeck Division with Davellin, Star, and Gavin

 

9 to report problems with David, right?

 

10 A. The Hollenbeck Division is composed of two

 

11 different separate buildings. The Hollenbeck Police

 

12 Department is a separate building from the

 

13 Hollenbeck detective center. And if you walk there,

 

14 it’s quite a distance. But on car, it’s quite fast.

 

15 And there’s even, I think, a bridge, a freeway

 

16 bridge that separates both things, and they’re even

 

17 on separate side of the buildings. Separate side of

 

18 the street, I mean.

 

19 Q. And you know that police department quite

 

20 well, correct?

 

21 A. I’ve never gone to the police department.

 

22 I’ve only gone to the detective center.

 

23 Q. And on October 4th, 2001, you did go to the

 

24 Hollenbeck detective section, correct?

 

25 A. I don’t remember the date, but I do remember

 

26 the event.

 

27 Q. Would it refresh your recollection if I just

 

28 show you a report to refresh your memory on the 6551

 

1 date?

 

2 A. If you say the date’s on there, then that

 

3 should be correct. That should be accurate.

 

4 Q. I can’t testify. Can I just show it to you?

 

5 A. Well, if it’s on the paper, it’s correct.

 

6 Q. Okay. Would it refresh your recollection if

 

7 I just show it to you?

 

8 A. Okay. Come on over.

 

9 MR. MESEREAU: May I approach, Your Honor?

 

10 THE COURT: Yes. But, Counsel, she’s

 

11 conceded the date. So what are you doing?

 

12 MR. MESEREAU: If the Court permits, I’ll

 

13 just read the date into the record.

 

14 MR. ZONEN: Your Honor, I’ll stipulate to

 

15 the date as being the date of the event.

16 THE COURT: Without stipulation, she’s

 

17 conceded whatever date is on there is accurate. So

 

18 let’s move along.

 

19 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, Your Honor.

 

20 Q. The date on the report is October 4th, 2001.

 

21 A. Okay.

 

22 Q. And you recall going to the detective

 

23 division to speak about your problems with David,

 

24 correct?

 

25 A. Yes. The detective there had invited me, if

 

26 I wanted to come on over, to come on over, because

 

27 our phone had been — our interview had been by the

 

28 phone. 6552

 

1 Q. Now, you got to the detective division and

 

2 asked to talk to a detective, correct?

 

3 A. Yes. I think it was the same one that I had

 

4 been talking to.

 

5 Q. And you told the detective you wanted to

 

6 show the detective a videotape and numerous photos

 

7 of you and your children spending time with various

 

8 celebrities?

 

9 A. Yes, because he had a hard time believing

 

10 that a woman in East L.A. with her children knew

 

11 such — knew — knew them. And he’s a detective,

 

12 so, you know, he was curious.

 

13 Q. Did you bring the photos of celebrities with

 

14 you?

 

15 A. Yes, I did.

 

16 Q. And what photos of celebrities did you bring

 

17 to the detective division of the Hollenbeck

 

18 Division?

 

19 A. I think it was — I think it was mostly of

 

20 Chris. Chris and Aja.

 

21 Q. And according to the detective, you laughed

 

22 and appeared happy at the meeting, correct?

 

23 A. Yes, because finally me and my children are

 

24 getting some sense of freedom.

 

25 Q. It says you seemed happy as you showed him

 

26 information about various celebrities, correct?

 

27 A. Well, it was a video of Chris and the

 

28 children together. And Aja. 6553

During the weekend break, Janet met for 10 minutes with the prosecution to her testimony review and police documents, including one in which she told police that Michael Jackson, Kobe Bryant, and weatherman Fritz Coleman would help her! She claimed she said this because David told her that he would tell everyone that she had slept with them, and she wanted them to verify that it wasn’t true.

1 Q. Now, before you testified has anyone showed

 

2 you any police reports to review?

 

3 A. Yes, they have shown them to me.

 

4 Q. And who’s “they”?

 

5 A. The D.A.’s Office.

 

6 Q. Okay. And when did they do that,

 

7 approximately?

 

8 A. Approximately, probably — I think it was

 

9 days ago, yes.

 

10 Q. Okay. Did you meet over the weekend with

 

11 anyone from the prosecution?

 

12 A. Yes, I did.

 

13 Q. Who was that?

 

14 A. Mr. Zonen.

 

15 Q. And when did you meet Mr. Zonen?

 

16 A. Yesterday, with a detective present.

 

17 Q. And did you go over documents?

 

18 A. No.

 

19 Q. Did you talk about your testimony?

 

20 A. Yes.

 

21 Q. How long was the meeting?

 

22 A. With me? Probably about — about ten

 

23 minutes.

 

24 Q. Okay. And the whole meeting was ten

 

25 minutes?

 

26 A. Yes.

 

27 Q. Okay. And where did it take place?

 

28 A. At — in – 6554

 

1 Q. Don’t give your address if it’s your home.

 

2 Just say it’s, you know, at a residence.

 

3 A. No.

 

4 Are you okay?

 

5 BAILIFF CORTEZ: I apologize.

 

6 THE WITNESS: I don’t know what you —

 

7 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Was it at a residence?

 

8 A. No. No, it wasn’t.

 

9 Q. Was it at an office?

 

10 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object to the location,

 

11 Your Honor.

 

12 THE COURT: He’s just trying to get a general

 

13 statement. It’s overruled.

 

14 You may answer.

 

15 THE WITNESS: Where I’m staying.

 

16 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Okay. Okay. And they

 

17 came to see you?

 

18 A. Yes.

 

19 Q. And the meeting was only ten minutes?

 

20 A. It was ten minutes.

 

21 Q. Okay.

 

22 A. I think he must have been on his way back to

 

23 the office, I guess.

 

24 Q. Okay. In your — in one of your domestic

 

25 violence disputes with David, do you remember

 

26 signing a declaration that your children — your

 

27 boys sleep with baseball bats because they’re afraid

 

28 of David? 6555

 

1 A. Yes.

 

2 Q. And was that true?

 

3 A. Yes.

 

4 Q. Okay. And when did your boys begin sleeping

 

5 with baseball bats, if you know?

 

6 A. To the best that I can remember, it’s when

 

7 David and Mr. Halpern, his attorney, were making

 

8 the — parading on the circuitry of the T.V., you

 

9 know, making their rounds on T.V. And so it

 

10 resurfaced a lot of things that they had been

 

11 already feeling. But it intensified in 2003.

 

12 Q. So because of the T.V. appearances by David

 

13 and his lawyer, your sons began sleeping with

 

14 baseball bats; is that what you’re saying?

 

15 A. It began then. It began. It’s the best I

 

16 can remember.

 

17 Q. Now, did the — now, excuse me, did you say

 

18 a prosecutor showed you various police reports?

 

19 A. Not yesterday.

 

20 Q. Not yesterday?

 

21 A. No.

 

22 Q. But at some point?

 

23 A. Yes. Yes.

 

24 Q. Did the prosecutor show you another police

 

25 report where you reported David for domestic

 

26 violence and told the police that Michael Jackson,

 

27 Kobe Bryant and Fritz Coleman are going to help you?

 

28 A. That’s because David was calling me “whore,” 6556

1 and he said — David said that he was going to tell

 

2 everybody that I had sex with them. And so if they

 

3 wanted to do that, they can go verify with them that

 

4 I’m not having sex with any of those people.

 

5 Q. That wasn’t in your police interview, was

 

6 it?

 

7 A. I did speak to the detective about it.

 

8 Q. So when you told the detective, “Michael

 

9 Jackson, Kobe Bryant and Fritz Coleman are going to

 

10 help me in my action against David,” that’s what you

 

11 were referring to?

 

12 A. Not action against David. That they can go

 

13 ask basically them themself that I’m not having sex

 

14 with them.

 

15 Q. Okay. But you’ve seen the report, and

 

16 nowhere in the report does it ever say that you told

 

17 the police officers that there are accusations that,

 

18 “I’m having sex with these celebrities,” correct?

 

19 A. Well, I don’t think that’s considered a

 

20 crime.

 

21 Q. So when the police officer just mentions

 

22 that quote, in your mind you should have also said,

 

23 “I told him the reason for the quote was that there

 

24 were false accusations about me having sex with

 

25 these celebrities,” correct?

 

26 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object. That question is

 

27 ambiguous.

 

28 THE COURT: Sustained. 6557

 

1 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Had you ever told Michael

 

2 Jackson anything about your domestic problems with

 

3 David?

 

4 A. No.

 

5 Q. Had you ever told Kobe Bryant anything about

 

6 your domestic problems with David?

 

7 A. No.

 

8 Q. Had you told Fritz Coleman anything about

 

9 your domestic problems with David?

 

10 A. No.

 

11 Q. And again, in looking at the report, you

 

12 know that there’s nothing in that report about these

 

13 false accusations of sex, you know that, correct?

 

14 MR. ZONEN: Objection; asked and answered.

 

15 THE COURT: Overruled.

 

16 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you know that?

 

17 A. I don’t think it was considered a crime.

 

18 Q. Would it refresh your recollection just to

19 see the report?

 

20 A. I don’t need to see the report. I’m telling

 

21 you that’s what happened and that’s it.

Janet was asked about a photograph of her holding a knife in a threatening manner, and she stated that she and David were just playing around when she posed for that photo. According to Janet, that photo was sold to the tabloids by David and his attorney:

Janet Arvizo holding knife

 

22 Q. Okay. Now, you had a hearing — excuse me,

 

23 let me rephrase that better.

 

24 Based on reports you made to the police,

 

25 David Arvizo was charged with domestic violence a

 

26 couple of times, right?

 

27 A. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

28 What – 6558

 

1 Q. I’ll be happy to rephrase.

 

2 Based on accusations you made about David

 

3 Arvizo being abusive and violent, he was prosecuted,

 

4 right?

 

5 A. I don’t under —

 

6 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object as speculative.

 

7 THE COURT: Sustained.

 

8 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you recall David Arvizo

 

9 being prosecuted for crimes related to domestic

 

10 violence?

 

11 A. Yes.

 

12 Q. And as far as you know, why was he

 

13 prosecuted?

 

14 A. Because he did the crime.

 

15 Q. And was he reported for those crimes, to

 

16 your knowledge?

 

17 A. He was investigated.

 

18 Q. And do you know how the investigations

 

19 began?

 

20 A. Yes, because the best I can remember is I

 

21 was outside getting beat up and some children called

 

22 the police.

 

23 Q. Now, do you recall, in — excuse me. At

 

24 some point you spoke to a city attorney, correct,

 

25 from the Los Angeles County City Attorney’s Office,

 

26 correct?

 

27 A. Okay. Which case are we talking about?

 

28 Q. One of your domestic — one of the domestic 6559

 

1 violence cases that were filed against your

 

2 ex-husband David. Do you recall talking to someone

 

3 named Soriano?

 

4 A. Okay, yes.

 

5 Q. Okay. And do you recall talking to Mr.

 

6 Soriano about a photograph that had you holding a

 

7 knife? Do you remember that?

 

8 A. I didn’t talk to him about it. He asked me,

 

9 because David and Mr. Halpern, the ones that they’ve

 

10 sold to the tabloids, presented it to me.

 

11 Q. And you didn’t deny there was a photo of you

 

12 with a knife like this, right?

 

13 A. Of course there was.

 

14 Q. And you had an explanation for that

 

15 photograph, right?

 

16 A. Of course.

 

17 Q. And please tell the jury what that

 

18 explanation is.

 

19 A. In the tabloids they have blurted out —

 

20 well, they phased out the running — I think it was

 

21 running water, dishes — full of dishes in the sink,

 

22 my son sitting in the background doing his homework.

 

23 I was washing the dishes at the time. And David had

 

24 asked me, he goes, “Hey, Janet’s like the movie.”

 

25 This is the best I can remember. And he said,

 

26 “Here,” and it was all done in jokingly, and he

 

27 snapped a picture. Well, we’re talking about one of

 

28 those throw-away camera pictures. And my son is 6560

 

1 clearly in the background doing his homework,

 

2 holding up his paperwork. It’s the best I can

 

3 remember.

 

4 Q. And you would agree you’re photographed with

 

5 a knife like this?

 

6 A. Yes, I am.

 

7 Q. And it all is play acting, right?

 

8 A. No, it was done jokingly.

 

9 Q. Okay. Some other photographs surface of you

 

10 with something else you were holding, correct?

 

11 A. That was a broom. You know, when you sweep

 

12 like this from left to right, depending, yes. And

 

13 they also — Mr. Halpern and David also sold that to

 

14 the tabloids.

 

15 Q. And that was meant in jest also, correct,

 

16 the photo of you with a broom?

 

17 A. Those pictures were taken in, hmm, I

 

18 think — I think in 1999. The best I can remember.

 

19 1999. No, goodness, I think 1998, actually. Seven

 

20 years ago. That is the best I can remember.

 

21 Q. Now, around October 16th of 2001, you filed

 

22 documents with the Superior Court through your

 

23 attorney, Michael Manning, in which you claimed

 

24 David had threatened to kill you and the kids,

 

25 right?

 

26 A. I don’t think it’s the word — the way

 

27 you’re saying it is word for word. But David, many,

 

28 many years, had already threatened me. Always. 6561

 

1 Q. And didn’t you say in documents filed with

 

2 the court David said he would kill you and the kids?

 

3 A. I think what is — I don’t think he’s saying

 

4 it word for word. But David had always threatened

 

5 me and the kids, always.

 

6 Q. Did he threaten you with death?

 

7 A. He always would.

 

8 Q. And you indicated that David said that if

 

9 you cause him trouble, he would have one of Ray’s,

 

10 his brother, people kill you and the kids, right?

 

11 A. Yes. David had said that for years, many,

 

12 many years to me.

 

13 Q. Who is Ray?

 

14 A. Ray is David’s brother, who is a convicted

 

15 drug dealer.

 

16 Q. And did Ray himself ever threaten you and

 

17 the children?

 

18 A. Ray never, never threatened me. It was all

 

19 per David’s own word.

 

20 Q. At some point did you mention in one of your

 

21 interviews that you had been abused in your own home

 

22 growing up?

 

23 A. Never.

 

24 Q. Okay. Did you ever mention anything about

 

25 your father being abusive?

 

26 A. Absolutely never.

 

27 Q. And you didn’t tell that to anyone, correct?

 

28 A. Never. 6562

 

1 Q. Okay. Did all the abuse in your home come

 

2 from David himself?

 

3 A. Always.

In this excerpt, Janet claimed that she didn’t know that Bradley Miller was an investigator for Mark Geragos, and that he didn’t identify himself as one, despite the fact that he recorded himself saying it before the interview started!

4 Q. Okay. Do you recall the meeting with Brad

 

5 Miller at Jay Jackson’s residence?

 

6 A. I think so.

 

7 Q. And do you recall Mr. Miller mentioning to

 

8 you and Jay Jackson and your family that he worked

 

9 for Attorney Mark Geragos, who represented Michael

 

10 Jackson?

 

11 A. No, I didn’t recall that. And it wasn’t

 

12 important to me because when he had walked in at the

 

13 door, he said he was Michael’s private investigator.

 

14 And also Frank had told me that Brad Miller was

 

15 Michael’s private investigator. So all that

 

16 mumbo-jumbo he was saying, it wasn’t brought to my

 

17 attention until we had a — here, I was here in this

 

18 courtroom, and I think it was September. So he’s

 

19 doing the same thing he did in September.

 

20 Q. When —

 

21 Move to strike, Your Honor.

 

22 THE COURT: I’ll strike after, “No, I didn’t

 

23 recall that.”

 

24 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: When you learned that Brad

 

25 Miller was an investigator, did it ever occur to you

 

26 that you were being investigated?

 

27 A. No. Because Frank had told me that he was

 

28 Michael’s private investigator and he was here to 6563

 

1 help me and the kids. And I believed him. I

 

2 believed too much of them.

 

3 Q. He said he was an investigator for Mark

 

4 Geragos in front of Major Jay Jackson, did he not?

 

5 A. Jay repeatedly kept coming in and out of his

 

6 bedroom.

 

7 Q. Did Brad Miller, as far as you remember,

 

8 ever tell Major Jay Jackson in Major Jay Jackson’s

 

9 home that he was an investigator for Mark Geragos,

 

10 who represented Michael Jackson?

 

11 A. No.

 

12 Q. Do you recall ever discussing with Jay

 

13 Jackson the fact that Brad Miller was a private

 

14 investigator?

 

15 A. No. It’s just that’s how he introduced

 

16 himself.

 

17 Q. Did you ever discuss with Jay Jackson either

 

18 before or after that interview who Brad Miller was?

 

19 A. There was no — I don’t know what he’s

 

20 trying — it’s so broad, but, the answer to that

21 question is no, as I’m understanding it.

 

22 Q. After the interview was completed, did you

 

23 ever discuss with Jay Jackson who Brad Miller was?

 

24 A. No.

 

25 Q. And did Jay Jackson ever ask you, “Janet, he

 

26 said he’s an investigator. Who is he?”

 

27 A. No.

 

28 Q. Did you ever learn that Asaf worked for 6564

 

1 Attorney Mark Geragos?

 

2 A. On the tape — on the tape-recorder that

 

3 Asaf illegally was taping the Child Protective

 

4 Services, he also says my son — I think my son

 

5 there, Star, asks him, and he points out that he’s

 

6 Michael’s security, or Star asks him, “Are you

 

7 Michael’s security?” And he clearly says by his own

 

8 mouth, “Yes.”

 

9 Q. Did you ever learn that Johnny was a private

 

10 investigator working with Miller?

 

11 A. Johnny told me he was Michael’s security.

 

12 Q. So it never occurred to you at any time that

 

13 Attorney Mark Geragos had anyone investigating who

 

14 you were and who your family was?

 

15 A. Well, first of all, why would he have a

 

16 criminal defense attorney —

 

17 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

18 THE WITNESS: — if there’s no criminal

 

19 investigation under its way?

 

20 THE COURT: You may answer that “yes” or

 

21 “no.” Did it occur to you?

 

22 THE WITNESS: Can you —

 

23 MR. MESEREAU: If we could have it read

 

24 back.

 

25 THE WITNESS: Could you ask it differently?

 

26 Because I answered you what I thought was the answer

 

27 that you were looking for.

 

28 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did it ever occur to you 6565

 

1 that Attorney Mark Geragos had hired investigators

 

2 to investigate who you and your family were and what

 

3 your plans were?

 

4 A. Criminal defense attorney, no. Now I know

 

5 he’s a criminal defense attorney. No.

 

6 Q. And you never discussed with Major Jackson

 

7 who these people are and what they’re doing,

 

8 correct?

 

9 A. No. I believed everything Frank had told

 

10 me. I believed everything Michael had told me. I

 

11 believed them. I trusted them, that’s why we’re

 

12 here today.

 

13 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike, Your Honor.

 

14 THE COURT: I’ll strike everything after

 

15 “No.”

Mesereau asked for permission to play the audiotape of the Bradley Miller interview AGAIN, and Judge Melville annoyingly asked if Mesereau could ask questions pertaining to the main points of the tape, instead of having the court listen to the entire 34 minute audiotape AGAIN. (This is one of the few rulings that I agreed with!)

So Mesereau began with Janet’s previous assertion that she didn’t know that Bradley Miller was Geragos’ investigator, despite the fact that on the tape she twice acknowledged him after he gave a description of his background. Also, pay attention to the fact that Janet admitted that everything nice that she said about Jackson in the Miller interview was true, yet everything from the rebuttal video was scripted!

16 MR. MESEREAU: At this time, Your Honor,

 

17 with the Court’s permission, we’d like to play the

 

18 audiotape of the Brad Miller interview,

 

19 Exhibit 5000.

 

20 THE COURT: Would you remind us how long that

 

21 tape is?

 

22 MR. SANGER: It’s 34 minutes and 24 seconds.

 

23 THE COURT: Are you going to interrupt the

 

24 tape with questions or just play it again?

 

25 MR. MESEREAU: I was going to interrupt with

 

26 a couple of questions. Not too many.

 

27 THE COURT: Can’t you just go to the points

 

28 in the tape that — instead of having us sit here 6566

 

1 again, listen to that whole tape?

 

2 MR. MESEREAU: I can do that, Your Honor.

 

3 THE COURT: All right. Do it.

 

4 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Miss Arvizo, do you

 

5 recall — the interview begins with Mr. Miller

 

6 saying the following: “All right. This is a

 

7 tape-recorded statement conducted with the Arvizo

 

8 family, conducted by Brad Miller. Today is Sunday,

 

9 February 16th, 2003. It’s now 9:47 p.m. on that

 

10 evening. And as I told you, my name is Brad Miller.

 

11 I’m a licensed private investigator working on

 

12 behalf of the Law Firm of Geragos & Geragos,

 

13 specifically for an attorney by the name of Mark

 

14 Geragos, who is an attorney for Michael Jackson.

 

15 And this conversation is being tape-recorded with

 

16 your permission, correct, Janet?”

 

17 And your answer is, “Yes.”

 

18 Do you recall Mr. Miller telling you he

 

19 worked for Mark Geragos?

 

20 A. In September it was brought to my attention,

 

21 this mumbo-jumbo. Up to that point I had only

 

22 believed he was Michael’s private investigator.

 

23 Q. Do you recall towards the end of that

 

24 recorded interview, Mr. Miller asks you the

 

25 following: “All right. Well, I thank you guys. I

 

26 think this has been very helpful. So let’s wrap

 

27 this up. It’s now about 10:25, Sunday night,

 

28 February 16th, 2003. As I’ve told you, my name is 6567

 

1 Brad Miller. I’m a private investigator working on

 

2 behalf of Mark Geragos, who’s an attorney for

 

3 Michael Jackson. And this conversation has been

 

4 tape-recorded with your permission, correct, Janet?”

 

5 Answer, by you, “Yes.”

 

6 Do you recall that?

 

7 A. I didn’t pay attention to that.

 

8 THE COURT: Counsel, do we have a transcript

 

9 yet for that?

 

10 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, we do, Your Honor. I

 

11 don’t think we’ve lodged it with the Court, but we

 

12 do have one.

 

13 THE COURT: Would you lodge it with the

 

14 Court, please?

 

15 MR. MESEREAU: I’ll see if I can —

 

16 THE COURT: Later today is fine.

 

17 MR. MESEREAU: Okay. Yes, we will.

 

18 Q. Where was Jay — excuse me, where was Major

 

19 Jay Jackson during that interview?

 

20 A. My husband — in the beginning, we were

 

21 just — it was a new relationship. And at that

 

22 point I think he must have been in his bedroom,

 

23 because you saw him kind of detached, what was going

 

24 on.

 

25 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike, Your Honor.

 

26 THE COURT: Stricken.

 

27 You just need to answer the question.

 

28 Listen to it carefully, and then just answer the 6568

 

1 question. Don’t volunteer additional information.

 

2 Would you — do you want to restate it or do

 

3 you want the court reporter to read it back?

 

4 MR. MESEREAU: If the court reporter would

 

5 read it back, I’d appreciate it. Thank you.

 

6 (Record read.)

 

7 THE WITNESS: The majority of the time, in

 

8 his bedroom.

 

9 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you recall Major Jay

 

10 Jackson sitting during the majority of that

 

11 interview on the couch?

 

12 A. The majority of that interview he was in his

 

13 bedroom.

 

14 Q. Now, is it your — let me rephrase that.

 

15 Are you claiming that what you said in this

 

16 interview on February 16th, 2003, was scripted?

 

17 A. I already told him before. Everything that

 

18 was on the Bradley Miller audiotape was from my

 

19 heart, from the initial lovey-dovey meeting that I

 

20 had in Miami. I believed him and I trusted him.

 

21 So, it’s — the best I can say, it’s most — it’s

 

22 all accurate.

 

23 Q. You were asked by Mr. Miller, “What was Mr.

 

24 Jackson’s role in his recovery?” referring to Gavin

 

25 and his cancer. Do you remember that?

 

26 A. Uh-huh.

 

27 Q. And you said, “Like a father, like a father

 

28 to him.” Do you remember that? 6569

 

1 A. Yes.

 

2 Q. Brad Miller said to you, “What would Michael

 

3 do?”

 

4 And your answer was, “Everything a loving

 

5 father, unselfish, kind,” then inaudible, “exhibits

 

6 unconditional love,” correct?

 

7 A. All of the Bradley Miller audiotape, it’s

 

8 all correct and accurate. That’s how I felt.

 

9 Q. Now, your son Gavin also spoke in that

 

10 interview, correct?

 

11 A. Yes.

 

12 Q. And as far as you know, he was telling the

 

13 truth, right?

 

14 A. There’s — there was a few times that I had

 

15 stepped out, because I was feeling a little bit

 

16 concerned as to why and — how Jay was feeling,

 

17 because it was a new relationship with me that I was

 

18 beginning with Jay, so I was getting a little

 

19 concerned as to why Jay kept coming in and out. So

 

20 there’s periods in there that I’m not present when

 

21 there’s being audiotape.

22 Q. Gavin said that Michael would always put a

 

23 smile on his face. Do you remember that?

 

24 A. I have since read the — the transcript of

 

25 the audiotape. And like I said, everything there is

 

26 accurate. Everything there is correct. That’s how

 

27 they were feeling at that moment and at that time.

 

28 Q. And you were there when Gavin said Michael 6570

 

1 didn’t come to the hospital but he would call him on

 

2 the phone, correct?

 

3 A. Pardon me?

 

4 Q. You were present at the interview when Gavin

 

5 said Michael didn’t come to the hospital. He would

 

6 call on the phone, right?

 

7 A. Yes. He did — Michael never once came to

 

8 the hospital. But there was long hours of

 

9 conversations, hours and hours.

 

10 Q. And you said in that interview, “And that’s

 

11 one thing the role Michael was, he wasn’t just a

 

12 father figure to Gavin, he also was to Star and

 

13 Davellin, because he knew that all three of them

 

14 needed him and he was — um, is family to me. And

 

15 he also realized that I needed him.” Correct?

 

16 A. Yes. This is stemming from the initial

 

17 meeting that I had in Miami that he gave me a

 

18 reinterpretation of what his role was. This is from

 

19 Michael in Miami.

 

20 Q. So this is from your heart and it’s the

 

21 truth, correct?

 

22 A. Yes, it is. It is.

Next, Mesereau asked Janet about her descriptions of David’s abuse during her interview with Miller. For example, she described an incident in August 2000 where David was upset with her for dancing with Jackson, and Mesereau used this to pounce on her earlier statement of never having had a conversation with Jackson. Janet claimed that she danced with Jackson but didn’t converse with him, which is total baloney because she also ate dinner with him at his dinner table (this is when Gavin asked her if he could sleep in Jackson’s bedroom):

23 Q. You talked about David being charged with

 

24 child endangerment and terrorist threats, right?

 

25 A. If that’s on there, yes.

 

26 Q. Would it refresh your recollection? I can

 

27 show it to you.

 

28 A. Yes. 6571

 

1 Q. And Davellin said that David had broken her

 

2 tailbone, correct?

 

3 A. Yes, he had.

 

4 Q. And that was true, correct?

 

5 A. Yes. Yes. With his big old foot. Kicked

 

6 her right —

 

7 Q. Gavin said that David hit him during his

 

8 cancer treatment?

 

9 A. Oh, yes.

 

10 Q. And that was also true, right?

 

11 A. Yes.

 

12 Q. And Star said that David hit him where he

 

13 has a cyst, correct?

 

14 A. Yes.

 

15 Q. You said that David would even abuse the

 

16 dog, right?

 

17 A. Yes. He hurt many of our little animals.

 

18 Q. You mentioned a ferret and a dog, right?

 

19 A. Yes.

 

20 Q. Okay.

 

21 A. Yeah.

 

22 Q. You talked about, “They had filmed — when

 

23 they had filmed the beautiful story about Michael

 

24 and my son, David was there present.” Do you

 

25 remember that?

 

26 A. Yes. Yes.

 

27 Q. What were you referring to when you talked

 

28 about “the beautiful story about Michael and my 6572

 

1 son”?

 

2 A. It was the DVD that’s titled “Michael and

 

3 Gavin.” I had never seen it prior to this time, but

 

4 Michael had informed me that it was a beautiful

 

5 story. So this is a — all stemming from the Miami

 

6 meeting, that 45-minute lovey-dovey meeting that I

 

7 had with Michael.

 

8 Q. So when you talked about the beautiful

 

9 story, you hadn’t seen it; is that true?

 

10 A. I had never seen it prior to Gary giving it

 

11 to Evvy — I mean Evvy giving it to Gary and Gary

 

12 giving it to us.

 

13 Q. You said that David was mad one day because

 

14 you and Michael were dancing, right?

 

15 A. Yes. And this was — this was David’s

 

16 character. You know, I couldn’t wear makeup.

 

17 Couldn’t shave my legs. You know, just different

 

18 things.

 

19 So, yes, it was a — I was happy to see

 

20 Gavin dancing, because Gavin at that point had like

 

21 a toddler walk. And, to me, that made me happy.

 

22 And we were at a 20-foot distance and yet I still

 

23 got beat up for that.

 

24 Q. But you said that, “Me and Michael were

 

25 dancing,” correct?

 

26 A. Yes, me, Michael, the children. You don’t

 

27 take it out of context or make it dirty. He was —

 

28 me, Michael, the children, other guests there. It 6573

 

1 was inside this — what is it? — bumper cars area,

 

2 and they have the ability to play the music really

 

3 loud, so — and that’s what — that’s just what it

 

4 was all about.

 

5 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike the comments,

 

6 Your Honor.

 

7 THE COURT: Denied.

 

8 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Where were you and Michael

 

9 dancing?

 

10 A. It was inside, just the children, me,

 

11 Michael and other guests there, under a tent in the

 

12 bumper car area.

 

13 Q. And when did this happen?

 

14 A. That happened in the initial meeting in

 

15 August of 2000. And I was happy to see that Gavin

 

16 was actually trying to dance. He wasn’t able to

 

17 dance. But because he had a toddler walk, to me,

 

18 that was a big step.

 

19 Q. Did you tell the jury last week you had

 

20 never had a conversation with Michael Jackson until

 

21 Miami?

 

22 A. Yes, I never had a conversation with

 

23 Michael. Michael didn’t talk to me in the initial

 

24 visit with him.

 

25 Q. You danced with him, but you never talked to

 

26 him?

 

27 A. That’s right. It wasn’t me and him solely

 

28 under the blue sky night. It was me, him, my 6574

 

1 children, other guests, under a tent in the bumper

 

2 car area, which they had the ability to play the

 

3 music really loud.

 

4 Q. The first time you visited Neverland, do you

 

5 recall having dinner in the main house at Neverland?

 

6 A. Yes.

 

7 Q. Do you recall Michael Jackson being there?

 

8 A. Yes.

 

9 Q. Do you recall a discussion about where Gavin

 

10 was going to sleep?

 

11 A. It wasn’t a discussion with me. It was a

 

12 discussion with David.

 

13 Q. And approximately when did that dinner take

 

14 place?

 

15 A. Dinnertime.

 

16 Q. Approximate month and year?

 

17 A. Approximate, August 2000.

 

18 Q. And you never spoke to Michael Jackson at

 

19 that dinner table?

 

20 A. No. David was present.

 

21 Q. How long did the dinner last?

 

22 A. I guess maybe — maybe 20 minutes’ worth.

 

23 Maybe.

Judge Melville became annoyed again and told Mesereau that he could strike one of Janet’s answers, but what would be the point because all Mesereau is doing is having her confirm statements that she already admitted that she made, and that she meant at that time, so Mesereau moved on:

24 Q. Getting back to the Brad Miller recording,

 

25 you said the following: “In my observance and their

 

26 interaction, and Gavin with Michael and Star, with

 

27 Michael and Davellin, with Michael is that, as a

 

28 father figure, he provides for them. He provides 6575

 

1 them with a sense of humor. He’s very funny. And a

 

2 sense of direction and guidance.”

 

3 And you meant what you were saying, correct?

 

4 A. Yes, I did. This is my observance of what I

 

5 saw in Miami. But now I know different what was

 

6 happening and I was — and I was clueless.

 

7 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike the comments.

 

8 THE COURT: I’ll strike after “Yes, I did.”

 

9 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: You said, “Michael’s

 

10 everything that an ultimate father is, and that’s

 

11 what the children have always prayed for, is a

 

12 father, and that God has blessed them with. And me,

 

13 I’ve always wanted family, so he’s family to me.”

 

14 You said that from your heart, correct?

 

15 A. Yes. He put on a good show in Miami.

 

16 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike the comment.

 

17 THE COURT: Strike the — after “Yes.”

 

18 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: And you said, “In being

 

19 what I endured in 17 years, I would be the most

 

20 sensitive to any little thing. And Michael has

 

21 never, absolutely never, made me feel in any way,

22 form, shape or matter that anything was anything

 

23 different other than Gavin as a son to Michael, Star

 

24 as a son to Michael, Davellin as a daughter to

 

25 Michael, and Michael father, like a father to all

 

26 three of them.”

 

27 Do you remember saying that?

 

28 MR. ZONEN: What page are we on? 6576

 

1 MR. MESEREAU: 12.

 

2 MR. ZONEN: Thank you.

 

3 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you remember saying

 

4 those words?

 

5 A. Yes, and now I realize how stupid I was.

 

6 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

7 THE COURT: I’ll strike after, “Yes,” but

 

8 what’s the point? I mean, on the questions here,

 

9 you’re asking her whether she said things. We’ve

 

10 heard the tape, we know what she said. Do you have

 

11 specific areas you wanted to ask her about?

 

12 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, Your Honor.

 

13 THE COURT: Getting her to say again that she

 

14 said those things doesn’t seem to be getting us

 

15 somewhere here, to me.

 

16 MR. MESEREAU: I’ll tie it up, Your Honor.

In this excerpt, Janet explained once again that her statements to Miller were true, and she spent the next four days rehearsing for the rebuttal video with “the Germans”. Seriously.

Mesereau then moved on to her relationship with Jamie Masada, and the celebrities that he introduced her to.

17 Q. Ms. Arvizo, do you remember telling the jury

 

18 that you were rehearsing with the people you refer

 

19 to as the Germans for the February 20th interview?

 

20 A. Yes.

 

21 Q. This interview with Brad Miller is February

 

22 16th, 2003, correct?

 

23 A. Yes.

 

24 Q. You’ve told the jury it wasn’t rehearsed,

 

25 correct?

 

26 A. That’s correct.

 

27 Q. Are you saying in the next four days you

 

28 rehearsed for the February 20th video? 6577

 

1 A. Prior to Jesus, it was many times daily in

 

2 Neverland with Dieter. First it was Ronald, Dieter,

 

3 and then it became Dieter hands on. And as you can

 

4 see, maybe you’ve — it’s been played approximately

 

5 five or six times here, and I’m sure there’s many

 

6 people that can recite it now. Imagine me working

 

7 daily, Dieter hands on, with me and my kids, many

 

8 times in one day, how that’s possible.

 

9 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

10 THE COURT: I’ll ask you just to answer the

 

11 question again. The question was, “Are you saying

 

12 in the next four days you rehearsed for the February

 

13 20th video?” And what’s your answer to that

 

14 question?

 

15 THE WITNESS: It had already done — been

 

16 done prior with Dieter on a daily basis.

 

17 THE COURT: All right. I’ll strike her other

 

18 answer. Next question.

 

19 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: You’re saying you’d

 

20 rehearsed with Dieter before, but what you said on

 

21 this interview with Brad Miller was from the heart,

 

22 right?

 

23 A. Yes.

 

24 Q. All right. When did you first meet Jamie

 

25 Masada?

 

26 A. The best I can remember, I think it was —

 

27 it was definitely before Gavin became ill.

 

28 Q. And how did you meet him? 6578

 

1 A. Through — the best I can remember, it

 

2 was — I had seen a flyer at a public school that

 

3 was, you know, talking about a comedy camp.

 

4 Q. Did you bring your children to Jamie

 

5 Masada’s comedy camp?

 

6 A. Yes, I did.

 

7 Q. Okay. And did your children attend the

 

8 comedy camp?

 

9 A. Yes. Yes, they did.

 

10 Q. Did you attend with them?

 

11 A. Yes. Every single time. I did.

 

12 Q. Now, do you recall any of your children

 

13 getting on stage and performing about how poor your

 

14 family was?

 

15 A. Yes, I do.

 

16 Q. And do you recall telling Jamie Masada that

 

17 your children dove into a fountain for coins?

 

18 A. No.

 

19 Q. Do you recall telling George Lopez your

 

20 children dove into a fountain for coins?

 

21 A. No. It may have been David maybe. If

 

22 they’re saying that, it may have been David.

 

23 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

24 THE COURT: Stricken after “No.”

 

25 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Jamie Masada introduced

 

26 you to various celebrities, right?

 

27 A. Not just me, the whole group, the whole —

 

28 everybody. Everybody that was attending. 6579

 

1 Q. And did you meet various celebrities through

 

2 Jamie Masada?

 

3 A. Yes.

 

4 Q. And who did you meet?

 

5 A. There were guest comics. And me personally,

 

6 I didn’t get to meet them. The only people I did

 

7 get to meet was — personally was George Lopez.

 

8 This is the best I can remember. Louise Palanker.

 

9 Fritz Coleman. Sully McCullough. That’s the best I

 

10 can remember. Those are the people that I

 

11 personally met. And of course Chris Tucker and his

 

12 fiancee, girlfriend, I don’t know how they are now,

 

13 but that’s the best I can remember. Me personally.

 

14 Q. And approximately what month and year was

 

15 this?

 

16 A. The best I can remember, it was all prior to

 

17 Gavin becoming ill. The only one that we met after

 

18 Gavin was ill was Chris Tucker. And with Aja. This

 

19 is the best I can remember. But all the other ones

 

20 that have already came up here, it was prior to

 

21 Gavin becoming ill.

Next, the J.C. Penney suit was the subject of cross-examination again, and Janet once again gave herself an honest assessment by admitting that she said she was depressed during her deposition because she was a “nobody”, and that she is STILL a “nobody”!

Janet also confirmed that she filed for disability because of her depression, which was caused from the fact that her husband didn’t lover her or her kids anymore. Whatever. Mesereau pointed out that she deliberately didn’t tell her lawyers during her deposition that David caused her depression because she was worried that it would affect her settlement.

22 Q. In your deposition in the J.C. Penney case,

 

23 and I’m referring to December 18th, 2000, you

 

24 indicated that you had filed a state disability

 

25 claim because you were depressed. Remember that?

 

26 A. Um, yes.

 

27 Q. You were asked what caused the depression.

 

28 You said it was not your marriage, “I was just sad 6580

 

1 about being a nobody.” Do you remember that?

 

2 A. I’m still a nobody.

 

3 Q. Would you just answer the question. Isn’t

 

4 that what you said?

 

5 A. If it’s on there, that’s correct.

 

6 Q. Would it refresh your recollection if I just

 

7 show you that?

 

8 A. There was many things why I was sad. Most

 

9 of all, the man that I was married that didn’t love

 

10 me or my kids.

 

11 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

12 THE COURT: Strike that answer. I’m not

 

13 quite sure what the question is at this point,

 

14 however.

 

15 MR. MESEREAU: I’ll rephrase; I can restate

 

16 it, Your Honor.

 

17 Q. You testified under oath, Ms. Arvizo, that

 

18 you filed a state disability claim because you were

 

19 depressed, and when asked why you were depressed,

 

20 you said, “I was sad about being a nobody,” right?

 

21 MR. ZONEN: Objection; compound.

 

22 THE COURT: Sustained.

 

23 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you remember being

 

24 questioned about why you had filed a state

 

25 disability claim?

 

26 A. No, I don’t. But what he’s talking about —

 

27 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object as nonresponsive.

 

28 THE COURT: Sustained. 6581

 

1 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you remember filing a

 

2 state disability claim?

 

3 A. Not at that time. It was years and years

 

4 and years prior to what he’s saying now.

 

5 Q. Do you remember why you filed that state

 

6 disability claim?

 

7 A. Depression.

 

8 Q. And the depression was because you felt you

 

9 were a nobody, right?

 

10 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object as irrelevant;

 

11 immaterial.

 

12 THE COURT: Overruled.

 

13 You may answer.

 

14 THE WITNESS: I’m still a nobody. But now

 

15 I’m with somebody that’s just a regular person.

 

16 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike, Your Honor.

 

17 I’d just request the witness be asked to respond to

 

18 the question.

 

19 THE COURT: I’ll strike the answer. Are you

 

20 asking her if that’s the reason she gave on the

 

21 form?

22 MR. MESEREAU: In the deposition, Your

 

23 Honor.

 

24 THE COURT: I think you need to make that

 

25 clear. It’s not clear.

 

26 MR. MESEREAU: Okay. I will do that.

 

27 Q. Ms. Arvizo, in your deposition in the J.C.

 

28 Penney case on Monday, December 18th, 2000, you had 6582

 

1 admitted you had filed a state disability claim,

 

2 correct?

 

3 A. Yes. Years prior.

 

4 Q. You said you filed a claim for depression,

 

5 true?

 

6 A. Yes.

 

7 Q. You were asked if your marriage had caused

 

8 depression. Do you remember that?

 

9 A. No, I don’t remember that.

 

10 Q. Would it refresh your recollection if I just

 

11 show you those pages?

 

12 A. No. But if it’s on there, it’s correct.

 

13 Q. You were asked was it your marriage, and

 

14 your answer was, “No, I was just sad about being a

 

15 nobody,” correct?

 

16 A. And I’m still a nobody.

 

17 Q. In your effort to obtain money in that

 

18 lawsuit, you didn’t want anyone to think you had had

 

19 any depression from — caused by David, correct?

 

20 A. That’s incorrect.

In this excerpt, Janet was asked if she told Azja that she was excited to go to Brazil, and if she had asked her if she wanted to tag along! (Although she denied this to Mesereau, it’s clearly obvious that she told Azja these things, which is why Mesereau asked her about it.)

21 Q. When did you last see Brad Miller?

 

22 A. When did I last see Brad Miller?

 

23 Q. Yes.

 

24 A. When he was standing right next to — next

 

25 to the camera, in the rebuttal video. Right there.

 

26 Here’s the camera. Here’s Brad Miller. Right

 

27 there. I think. That’s my best remember — my best

 

28 recollection. 6583

 

1 Q. The interview with the DCFS was the morning

 

2 after the rebuttal video.

 

3 A. Oh, that’s right. He did come afterwards

 

4 and — that’s — go ahead.

 

5 Q. Was Brad Miller at the meeting with the

 

6 representatives of the Department of Children &

 

7 Family Services?

 

8 A. No, he wasn’t present there when they were

 

9 there.

 

10 Q. So was the last time you saw him, that you

 

11 can recall, where you did the rebuttal video? Was

 

12 that the last place you saw him?

 

13 A. He did come afterwards, after the ladies had

 

14 left. The ladies were no longer in my apartment.

 

15 He did come afterwards.

 

16 Q. Was it your idea to have the DCFS interview

 

17 at Major Jackson’s home?

 

18 A. I think so.

 

19 Q. Why?

 

20 A. I don’t remember.

 

21 Q. Were you living at Major Jackson’s home —

 

22 A. No.

 

23 Q. — when you had that interview?

 

24 A. No.

 

25 Q. Did you represent to the social workers from

 

26 the DCFS that that was your home?

 

27 A. No, I told them this was my boyfriend’s

 

28 home. 6584

 

1 Q. Did you tell him that your children ever

 

2 stayed there?

 

3 A. I did tell them that we visited there.

 

4 Q. Was your intent to make them think that’s

 

5 where your children lived?

 

6 A. Absolutely not. They know where I lived. I

 

7 lived in East L.A. on Soto Street. They knew that.

 

8 Q. Now, I believe you told the jury that at

 

9 that interview was someone named Aja Pryor, correct?

 

10 A. Aja Pryor, yes.

 

11 Q. And Aja Pryor at the time, as far as you

 

12 knew, was actor and comedian Chris Tucker’s fiancee,

 

13 right?

 

14 A. At that time that’s what I felt. They do

 

15 have a baby together.

 

16 Q. And her baby was there for the interview,

 

17 right?

 

18 A. Yes.

 

19 Q. And after the interview was over, you drove

 

20 somewhere with Aja Pryor, didn’t you?

 

21 A. Incorrect.

 

22 Q. Did you ever drive with Aja Pryor anywhere

 

23 after the interview?

 

24 A. No.

 

25 Q. Did Aja Pryor ever drive you to Neverland at

 

26 any time?

 

27 A. No.

 

28 Q. How often did you used to talk to Aja Pryor 6585

1 during this time period?

 

2 A. Often.

 

3 Q. Would you call her?

 

4 A. Yes.

 

5 Q. Would she call you?

 

6 A. We’re talking about a friendship that had

 

7 gone on for years. So can you specify the time

 

8 period?

 

9 Q. Sure. Let’s say between January of 2003 and

 

10 April of 2003.

 

11 A. Okay. Prior to Neverland, it was back and

 

12 forth phone calls. During Neverland, it was —

 

13 there was no return phone call that she can call me

 

14 back on.

 

15 Q. Do you recall Miss Pryor ever driving your

 

16 children to Neverland?

 

17 A. Yes.

 

18 Q. When was that?

 

19 A. That was right after the CPS interview, when

 

20 Asaf had escorted Aja and the children to the car.

 

21 And they were being followed.

 

22 Q. Did you ask —

 

23 Move to strike the comments.

 

24 THE COURT: Denied.

 

25 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you ask Miss Pryor to

 

26 drive your children to Neverland after the DCFS

 

27 interview?

 

28 A. No. 6586

 

1 Q. Do you know why she did that?

 

2 A. That was already prearranged.

 

3 Q. How was it prearranged?

 

4 A. Well, it was already in a conversation

 

5 prior, per Frank’s instructions.

 

6 Q. Did you ever ask Aja Pryor for the keys to

 

7 Chris Tucker’s car?

 

8 A. No.

 

9 Q. To your knowledge, did Davellin ever do

 

10 that?

 

11 A. No.

 

12 Q. Do you recall ever being in a call with

 

13 Davellin where you and Davellin asked Aja Pryor to

 

14 the keys to Chris Tucker’s automobile?

 

15 A. No.

 

16 Q. Do you recall discussing going to Brazil

 

17 with Aja Pryor?

 

18 A. Like I had told you, remember those

 

19 conversations that I would have and try to slip

 

20 something in? So at the end of the — all these

 

21 people could put this puzzle together as to where me

 

22 and my children were finally at.

 

23 Q. Do you recall telling Aja Pryor that you

 

24 were excited to go to Brazil?

 

25 A. No.

 

26 Q. Do you recall inviting Aja Pryor to go to

 

27 Carnaval in Brazil with you?

 

28 A. No. 6587

 

1 Q. When’s the last time you saw Aja Pryor?

 

2 A. I think it was the CPS meeting. I think

 

3 that was the last day.

Now, let’s get to the good stuff! Mesereau finally gets to Janet’s police interviews, and boy were they interesting, to say the least! Janet attended vocational school in the summer and fall of 2003 (so she claimed) and studied to be an orthopedic technologist; too bad this stupid trial diverted her dreams!

Janet also confirmed that she was an acquaintance of Carol Lamere, a grandmother of one of the students in Davellin’s tap dance studio, and that Davellin spent many nights at her house in 2000. This testimony corroborates Lamir’s interview with Mesereau’s investigator in which she stated that Davellin confessed that Janet planned to blackmail Jackson into buying her a house by threatening to accuse him of showing her sons online pornography; this interview can be read on pages 26-33 of this document.

4 Q. I’d like to ask you some questions about

 

5 some of the interviews you gave the sheriffs in

 

6 Santa Barbara, okay?

 

7 A. Okay.

 

8 Q. I’m just going to go through those

 

9 interviews.

 

10 You indicated in one interview that you were

 

11 studying to be an orthopedic technologist, correct?

 

12 A. Yes.

 

13 Q. And was that true?

 

14 A. Yes.

 

15 Q. And where were you doing that course of

 

16 study?

 

17 A. I was doing that at a vocational school in

 

18 Orange County.

 

19 Q. And what years did you attend there?

 

20 A. I attended approximately in 2003.

 

21 Q. Did you finish that course?

22 A. No.

 

23 Q. How long did you go to school there?

 

24 A. Probably summer and attempted to try to

 

25 finish fall.

 

26 Q. You mentioned to the sheriffs that you knew

 

27 Carol Lamir, correct?

 

28 A. Yes. That’s David’s girlfriend. 6588

 

1 Q. Well, before you thought she was David’s

 

2 girlfriend, you knew her in another capacity,

 

3 correct?

 

4 A. Yes, David and I both knew her.

 

5 Q. And how did you know her?

 

6 A. Through — she doesn’t like to call herself

 

7 grandmother, but she actually is the grandmother

 

8 to — to one of the children that was taking tap

 

9 dance lessons where my children were.

 

10 Q. And you met her at that school, correct?

 

11 A. This is correct.

 

12 Q. Okay. Did you stay in touch with her for

 

13 any length of time after you met her at that school?

 

14 A. David did.

 

15 Q. Did Davellin ever stay at her house, to your

 

16 knowledge?

 

17 A. Davellin stood, I think, when Gavin had

 

18 gotten ill, I think for less than one month. And I

 

19 came to find out that all she wanted Davellin was to

 

20 clean her house. And so I put a stop to that.

 

21 Q. To your knowledge, how many evenings did

 

22 Davellin stay at Carol Lamir’s house?

 

23 A. I can’t remember. But the best one who

 

24 could remember that would probably be Davellin.

 

25 We’re talking five years ago.

 

26 Q. Do you know if she spent weeks there?

 

27 A. I don’t think so.

 

28 Q. Did you often know if she was going to stay 6589

 

1 there?

 

2 A. Of course.

 

3 Q. Would she ask your permission to stay there?

 

4 A. No, she didn’t want to go to her house

 

5 anymore. And I came to find out is because all

 

6 Carol wanted her was to clean her house.

 

7 Q. But you don’t know approximately how many

 

8 nights Davellin stayed at Carol Lamir’s home, right?

 

9 A. No. Please. My son had cancer, I….

 

10 Q. Do you know approximately what year Davellin

 

11 was staying at Carol Lamir’s home?

 

12 A. Yes, this was when Gavin had cancer, in

 

13 2000.

Janet’s lies know no end! She claimed that during her stay at the Calabasas Hotel, she told Azja that she was being held against her will and asked her to call the police for her (so that the call wouldn’t be traced to her), and of course Azja will deny this later on in this trial when she testifies.

14 Q. Did you ever tell Aja Pryor that your family

 

15 was being held against their will?

 

16 A. Yes.

 

17 Q. When was this?

 

18 A. I think — I think it was during the hotel

 

19 period. That’s the best I can remember. I — I

 

20 tried to reach different people.

 

21 Q. And you specifically remember telling her

 

22 that you were being held against your will?

 

23 A. Yes.

 

24 Q. Do you remember ever asking her to call the

 

25 police?

 

26 A. No. That was another thing I slipped in,

 

27 and I was always hoping that these people would call

 

28 themself. This way the call didn’t come from me. 6590

 

1 Quick slip-in.

 

2 Q. Now, during the DCFS interview, Aja’s

 

3 present at Major Jackson’s home with three social

 

4 workers from Los Angeles, correct?

 

5 A. Yes.

 

6 Q. You never say anything about your being held

 

7 against your will, correct?

 

8 A. That’s correct. Because Asaf had already

 

9 told me — he already had warned me prior to them —

 

10 the ladies coming in.

 

11 Q. You saw Major Jackson when you arrived that

 

12 morning, correct?

 

13 A. Yeah — I think so. But it was a new

 

14 relationship with Jay, and he was a — now he has

 

15 softened up, but back then was very completely

 

16 organized.

Next, Mesereau questioned Janet about her knowledge of where Gavin and Star slept during their first visit to Neverland in August 2000 (for the record, Star and Gavin slept in Jackson’s bedroom on the night before they left)

17 Q. The first time you visited Neverland, did

 

18 you tell the jury you didn’t know where your sons

 

19 were the first evening?

 

20 A. Which — are you talking the police report?

 

21 MR. ZONEN: I’ll object as vague.

 

22 MR. MESEREAU: I’ll rephrase it if it’s

 

23 unclear.

 

24 THE COURT: All right.

 

25 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: The first time you, your

 

26 husband and your son — excuse me, you, your husband

 

27 and your children visited Neverland, do you remember

 

28 when that was? 6591

 

1 A. Yes.

 

2 Q. And approximately when was that?

 

3 A. In August of 2000.

 

4 Q. Do you remember where your son stayed that

 

5 first evening?

 

6 A. In Michael’s house.

 

7 Q. How did you know they were staying in

 

8 Michael’s house?

 

9 A. Because Gavin had asked.

 

10 Q. Did you hear Gavin ask?

 

11 A. Yes, I did.

 

12 Q. Do you know approximately where he made that

 

13 request?

 

14 A. No, I don’t remember.

 

15 Q. Did he make that request at the dinner

 

16 table, to your knowledge?

 

17 A. You know, I — I can’t remember that part.

 

18 Q. Did you —

 

19 A. We’re talking five years ago.

 

20 Q. Did you have any discussion with Michael

 

21 Jackson about where your sons were going to stay

 

22 that evening?

 

23 A. I didn’t — he didn’t talk to me. I didn’t

 

24 talk to him. It was David talking to Michael.

 

25 Q. So as far as you know, the first night you

 

26 were there, your sons were staying somewhere in the

 

27 main house, but you didn’t know where, right?

 

28 A. This is correct. 6592

 

1 Q. And you assumed that David knew where; is

 

2 that correct?

 

3 A. I assumed that children stay with children.

 

4 That’s what I assumed.

 

5 Q. Did you see your sons the next day?

 

6 A. Yes.

 

7 Q. Did you ask them where they had stayed that

 

8 evening?

 

9 A. No, I didn’t. They had told me that they

 

10 had played, and that was good.

 

11 Q. Did you then stay at Neverland a second

 

12 night?

 

13 A. I think so. Yes. Yes, yes.

 

14 Q. And was it your belief that your sons stayed

 

15 in the main house that night?

 

16 A. Yes, they did.

 

17 Q. Did you see them the next morning?

 

18 A. Yes.

 

19 Q. Did you ask them where they had spent the

 

20 evening?

 

21 A. No. I didn’t — now I know a lot of things.

 

22 Now I know —

 

23 MR. ZONEN: Objection; nonresponsive.

 

24 THE COURT: Sustained.

 

25 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Did you stay at Neverland

 

26 a third night during that first visit?

 

27 A. I don’t remember how many days we stayed

 

28 there, but I know it was just days. And that’s it. 6593

1 You’re going to walk me through each room — I mean

 

2 each door, each day, and I don’t know.

 

3 Q. Do you think you stayed more than two nights

 

4 at Neverland during that first visit?

 

5 A. Definitely more than two, but definitely

 

6 less than — less than a week. It was just days.

 

7 But I can’t remember, it was five years ago.

 

8 Q. Did you ever at any time ask your sons

 

9 during that first trip to Neverland where they had

 

10 spent the night?

 

11 A. No. No, I didn’t. But I’ve learned things

 

12 now —

 

13 MR. ZONEN: Objection; nonresponsive.

 

14 THE COURT: Sustained.

 

15 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

16 THE COURT: Stricken.

Next, Janet denied that she complained to anyone that Jackson wouldn’t return the Ford Bronco to her after he said he would repair it, which shows her lack of gratitude!

17 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: In one of your initial

 

18 interviews with the sheriffs, you talked about

 

19 Michael Jackson giving a big gift for Gavin, which

 

20 was a car, correct?

 

21 A. Yes. It looked exactly like the O.J.

 

22 Simpson truck.

23 Q. Was it an SUV?

 

24 A. It was — it was an old car. It looked like

 

25 just the O.J. Simpson Bronco thing.

 

26 Q. It wasn’t a Bronco, was it?

 

27 A. Oh, no. No. That’s incorrect. Thank you.

 

28 You’re right. It was a laptop computer. The truck 6594

 

1 came afterwards.

 

2 Q. Okay. I’m focusing on just the truck.

 

3 Okay?

 

4 A. Okay. Because you had mentioned the truck,

 

5 so —

 

6 Q. Well, you said it looked like Mr. Simpson’s

 

7 Bronco, but it was really a Chevy Blazer, wasn’t it?

 

8 A. No. I think it was a Ford Bronco.

 

9 Q. At some point, didn’t you refuse to return

 

10 the registration to that car?

 

11 A. I didn’t have no registration.

 

12 Q. Did you ever keep any of the papers

 

13 associated with that car?

 

14 A. No, a VIN number.

 

15 Q. Did you ever tell the sheriffs in any

 

16 interview, “I have the papers associated with that

 

17 car”?

 

18 A. I have papers that — I wrote down the VIN

 

19 number.

 

20 Q. Anything else?

 

21 A. No, that’s it.

 

22 Q. You were upset that that Blazer was

 

23 returned, weren’t you?

 

24 A. No.

 

25 Q. You never were upset?

 

26 A. No.

 

27 Q. Did you ever think it was wrongfully kept by

 

28 Mr. Jackson? 6595

 

 

1 A. No. What I thought was wrong is that they

 

2 wanted Gavin to come back alone to pick it up,

 

3 that’s what I thought. That was the uneasy part.

 

4 Q. Did you ever complain to anyone that,

 

5 “Michael Jackson said he would repair the car and we

 

6 never saw it again”?

 

7 A. No, I didn’t complain. That was just

 

8 information that — the police wanted to know every

 

9 detail, so that was the best I can recall. And

 

10 we’re talking about in 2001. This is four years

 

11 ago.

 

12 Q. Now, at some point, you said that Mr.

 

13 Jackson gave your son a laptop computer, right?

 

14 A. Yes, he did.

 

15 Q. And do you know approximately when that was?

 

16 A. That was the first visit that we had gone to

 

17 in August of 2000.

 

18 Q. And did you actually see that computer?

 

19 A. Yes.

 

20 Q. And was that returned at some point also?

 

21 A. Yes, it was.

 

22 Q. Do you remember telling the sheriffs that

 

23 you had kept the VIN number and registration?

 

24 A. Okay. Now I know the difference. It was

 

25 only VIN number. The paperwork of the VIN number.

 

26 That’s all.

 

27 Q. So when you said “registration,” it was a

 

28 mistake? 6596

 

1 A. Yes. It’s VIN number, that big long number.

 

2 Q. All right. And you also complained about

 

3 Michael’s people taking the computer back, correct?

 

4 A. No, I didn’t complain. I had just made them

 

5 aware, that’s all.

 

6 Q. And when you say you made them aware, who

 

7 were you talking about?

 

8 A. The police.

 

9 Q. Okay.

 

10 A. Because they wanted every detail that I can

 

11 possibly remember, so it was just information.

 

12 Q. Okay. You never complained to any sheriff

 

13 that the computer had been returned when it really

 

14 belonged to Gavin?

 

15 A. No. It was information.

 

16 Q. Okay.

 

17 THE COURT: Counsel?

 

18 MR. MESEREAU: Oh, okay.

 

19 THE COURT: Take our morning break.

 

20 (Recess taken.)

After returning from recess, Mesereau proceeded to question Janet about the gifts that Gavin received from Jackson during his hospital stay, and the phone messages that Jackson left for Gavin on his answering machine. Janet told police that Jackson was trying to cure Gavin, and by doing that she shot herself in the foot because the prosecution asserted that all of Jackson’s communications with Gavin were part of the grooming process! Janet admitted that she said that due to her own “cluelessness”.

1 THE COURT: Counsel?

 

2 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, thank you, Your Honor.

 

3 Q. Ms. Arvizo, you mentioned to the sheriffs in

 

4 one of your initial interviews that Michael had sent

 

5 gifts to Gavin, correct?

 

6 A. Yes.

 

7 Q. And what gifts do you recall Michael Jackson

 

8 sending to Gavin when Gavin was ill?

 

9 A. When Gavin was ill?

 

10 Q. Yes.

 

11 A. Go through the whole list?

 

12 Q. Sure. Whatever you can remember.

 

13 A. The best I can remember is the computer,

 

14 the — I think it was a Bronco – I just have a

 

15 picture of it – white, Christmas gifts, and that was

 

16 all, when he was sick.

 

17 Q. And what —

 

18 A. That’s the best I can remember.

 

19 Q. Do you remember anything being delivered at

 

20 the hospital for Gavin from Michael Jackson?

 

21 A. Yes, a big gift basket.

 

22 Q. Okay. Do you remember toys like Play

 

23 Station 3, things like that, being delivered to

 

24 Gavin for Michael?

 

25 A. Okay, I was incorrect in saying Play

 

26 Station 3. It was a Play Station 2, and that was

 

27 during Christmastime.

 

28 Q. Is that all the gifts you remember Gavin 6603

 

1 ever receiving from Michael Jackson?

 

2 A. This is the best I can remember, when Gavin

 

3 was sick.

 

4 Q. When Gavin wasn’t sick, do you remember

 

5 other gifts being given?

 

6 A. Yes. Michael would send things through —

 

7 through like a courier, messenger, something like

 

8 that, give baskets, and was saying, “I love you,

 

9 Gavin.”

 

10 Q. Do you remember telling the sheriffs that

 

11 when Michael Jackson gave those gifts and those

 

12 messages, you assumed he was trying to cure him,

 

13 because Gavin was ill? Do you remember saying

 

14 that?

 

15 A. No, I don’t think that’s exactly correct how

 

16 you’re saying it. But I feel when Gavin was sick,

 

17 there were just things that were get-you-well gifts,

 

18 I guess, I don’t know. The only thing that made me

 

19 uneasy was —

 

20 MR. MESEREAU: Objection; move to strike.

 

21 THE COURT: Overruled. And you interrupted

 

22 her answer.

 

23 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Do you remember telling

 

24 the sheriffs Michael Jackson would leave messages at

 

25 your home for Gavin?

 

26 A. Yes. He would leave — what kind of

 

27 messages? Phone messages?

 

28 Q. Yeah. He’ll say things like, “I’ll never 6604

 

1 forget you,” and things like that, right?

 

2 A. Okay. The best I can remember, Gavin had

 

3 his own private phone number, own answering machine,

 

4 because his room had to be sterile. And Michael

 

5 knew that it was his private — private phone line.

 

6 And that’s where Michael would leave the phone

 

7 messages.

 

8 Q. And you told the sheriffs when you were

 

9 discussing those messages, referring to Michael

 

10 Jackson, “He’s saying it out in the open. You know,

 

11 you know, he’s saying it probably because he’s ill,

 

12 trying to cure him.” Do remember that?

 

13 A. Yes. That again is my own cluelessness.

 

14 MR. MESEREAU: Move to strike.

 

15 THE COURT: The part after “Yes”? After

 

16 “Yes,” is that —

 

17 MR. MESEREAU: Yes, Your Honor.

 

18 THE COURT: All right. I’ll strike it.

Mesereau continues to ask about the various trips that Star and Gavin took to Neverland with their father, and the number of times Janet herself went with them (she never went back to Neverland after the first visit until 2003):

19 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: Now, you learned at some

 

20 point that Star, your son Star, had done a video at

 

21 Neverland with Mr. Jackson, correct?

 

22 A. Yes.

 

23 Q. And when did you learn about that video?

 

24 A. I think in Miami. That’s when I learned

 

25 that.

 

26 Q. And have you ever seen that video?

 

27 A. I’ve never seen that video.

 

28 Q. Okay. When Star was at Neverland making 6605

 

1 that video, did he ever discuss it with you?

 

2 A. No.

 

3 Q. You’ve described your first trip to

4 Neverland, okay? When was your second trip to

 

5 Neverland?

 

6 A. I think it was the — Aja and Chris’s baby

 

7 boy’s birthday party that Aja and Chris took

 

8 their — almost their entire whole family. He had

 

9 them flown in from Atlanta, Georgia.

 

10 Q. And approximately when was that trip?

 

11 A. That was approximately — I think it was

 

12 early September in 2002.

 

13 Q. After your first trip to Neverland, your

 

14 children went back with David on a couple of

 

15 occasions, did they not?

 

16 A. Not my children. My two boys. They went —

 

17 do you want me to say?

 

18 Q. Sure.

 

19 A. Okay. The initial visit, the best I can

 

20 remember – always, please, dates, best I can

 

21 remember – is August 2000. And then both my boys

 

22 returned with David to Neverland. Davellin did not

 

23 return. Davellin stood with me. So —

 

24 MR. MESEREAU: Okay. Your Honor, we have

 

25 lodged with the Court a transcript of the Brad

 

26 Miller interview, and I believe it’s Exhibit 5008.

 

27 THE COURT: Thank you.

 

28 THE CLERK: Is it received into evidence? 6606

 

1 THE COURT: No.

 

2 Q. BY MR. MESEREAU: During — let me get this

 

3 straight now. You went the first time with David

 

4 and your children, and there were a couple of times

 

5 after that that David just took your sons, correct,

 

6 to Neverland?

 

7 A. It was one other time.

 

8 Q. Okay. Was there just one other trip with

 

9 David and the sons alone?

 

10 A. Yes.

 

11 Q. All right. And when do you think that was?

 

12 A. That was right after, also.

 

13 Q. And how long a trip was that, if you

 

14 remember?

 

15 A. The best I remember, it was also — it was

 

16 also days.

 

17 Q. Do you know where your sons stayed, during

 

18 that trip, in the evening?

 

19 A. No, I don’t. The best — you can probably

 

20 ask the boys.

 

21 Q. Did you ever ask them yourself where they

 

22 had stayed during that next trip with David?

 

23 A. No.

 

24 Q. Did you ever ask David where they had stayed

 

25 during that trip?

 

26 A. No.

 

27 Q. Before 2003, how many times did you

 

28 personally visit Neverland? 6607

 

1 A. Before 2003?

 

2 Q. Yes.

 

3 A. Before 2003, best I can remember was the

 

4 initial visit that I went. I think it was August

 

5 2000. And then with Chris and Aja’s baby boy’s

 

6 birthday party in early September 2002.

 

7 Q. Now, during Chris and Aja’s birthday party,

 

8 Mr. Jackson was not present, right?

 

9 A. Yes. Mr. Jackson was not present.

 

10 Q. And did you stay in the guest quarters?

 

11 A. Not at all. It was only a day visit. It

 

12 was a birthday party. That’s all it was.

 

13 Q. You came in that morning and left that

 

14 evening?

 

15 A. Yes.

To be continued: https://michaeljacksonvindication2.wordpress.com/2013/06/22/april-18th-2005-trial-analysis-janet-arvizo-cross-examination-part-2-of-4/ 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: